Friday, March 20, 2009

Is there life after birth?

Well is there? With the greed, hatred, pollution and everything else is there life after birth and is it worth it?Fresh air, green grass and trees, animals, fantastic views they're all being destroyed by greed. Is it worth bring a kid into this world? With all the life prolonging procedures we have you can live longer but is the quality of living there? Is it worth it?If you had a choice would you allow yourself to be born again?
__________________

Sunday, March 15, 2009

Generation Bye-Bye

I read something the other day that said by 2050 or so we will have 9 billion people on the planet. Can the earth actually provide enough air, water and food for that amount of people? I'm sure some scientist somewhere has figured out how much air and water and food a human requires a year to just survive and they know how many can survive.Are carbon based fuels only a small part of global warming and the large part is too many people? I don't think we have to worry to much about aliens taking over the planet there is not going to be anything left soon. We could put up a sign however "THE EARTH IS FULL GO HOME!"Think about it, one theory put forth recently was that Mars had life and it destroyed that planet but before it died it sent colonists to Earth. And now we've destroyed this planet. Don't say we haven't we can't even agree on anything even on a small scale how could we ever agree on the correct way to save a planet? Nice legacy for the next few generations which one will be named "Generation Bye-Bye"?

Sunday, March 8, 2009

Banning Barbie

Has anyone heard of parental control, parental duty, parental responsibility? It appears not. I forgot what city or town or state banned the sale of Barbie dolls because something along the line of giving girls a false body image. Do these morons watch TV or listen to the radio, this country is going down the toilet and they're worried about a doll? If you're worried about false images you better ban TV, movies, magazines anywhere there are pictures of women. It's American culture actually every cultural has it's "perfect" type so now they want to make a CHILD'S TOY, A DOLL THAT HAS BEEN AROUND FOR 50 YEARS ILLEGAL right up there with automatic weapons and crack these people need a life.Back to my first question to my way of thinking it is the responsibility of the parents to give their offspring a good self image, to explain life to them that everyone is different and they should just be the best they can be. It doesn't appear parents can handle this so let's dump it on the government and the taxpayers. Yes the taxpayers who do think paid the legislators to enact this inane law, and it'll probably cost more to enforce it I can just see it now the BEA (Barbie Enforcement Agency) raiding toy stores guns drawn and all, it'll be a new reality show. How about the people who already one or more, do they have to turn them in? Will we have a new criminal element 6-12 year old girls dealing in illegal Barbies? Will they be suspended if they bring one to school?
Morons and idiots are running the world. This has to right up there with the stupidest law enacted in the history of the USA maybe the world

Thursday, March 5, 2009

Chimp victim

Can anyone explain to me why they are keeping this poor woman alive? No hand, no nose, no eyelids, facial structure totally destroyed, and they are not sure if she even has brain activity. Is that a life? How callous and uncaring is it to force someone to live like that? Are they just doing it to get the money for her care? I've never understood how cold and self centered people can be when it comes to keeping people alive when they have absolutely no quality of life. Don't tell me it's a gods choice to end someones life not when the only things keeping that person alive are machines that is nothing more than people playing god. Suicide and assisted suicide should be totally legal.

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

Obama hype

On the radio they were talking about “hype”. How Americans have the habit of hyping up the poorer choice. One example they were using was VHS over Beta. According to experts Beta was the better tape, yet VHS spent more money in hyping itself and became the major brand. It seems to happen in everything Starbucks is another example. The other thing Americans enjoy is novelty. When a product is being hyped and it is novel it becomes wildly successful for a time then reality sets in and buyers remorse starts. Is this what is happening with the new president? Did he only win because of the hype and the fact he was the first black candidate? Is buyer’s remorse setting in and that is why he is having problems getting solid democratic backing? Is he really the best person in this position? None of his ideas appear to help the average working class American; they just seem to be aimed at alienating big business and corporations. Don’t say we need to blindly get behind him and support his proposals that’s how most dictatorships, start blind foolish support and obedience. This new green house gas tax on business is just going to drive more companies out of America. I think it would be a lot more intelligent to loosen EPA and other restrictions on businesses to bring them back, to have them expand, to put more Americans back to work. Down the road work with industry to keep jobs in the US and protect the environment intelligently not with knee jerk reactions. If Obama and his administration does not do something quickly to bring real manufacturing jobs back to the US we won’t need to worry about EPA regulations, we won’t have any businesses any tax base any country. Taxing and putting the harshest restrictions on businesses in the world is not going to get the US going again. 4% percent of the popular vote was not a mandate or landslide by any stretch of an imagination. Obama has a long way to go to prove he is the best person for the position he holds and driving jobs out of the country doesn’t appear to me to be pro American. Maybe the radio show was correct and the hyped product is the worst choice or maybe Obama can prove that theory wrong. It’s all up to him.
__________________

Sunday, March 1, 2009

More brain dead government

The right hand says "Let's raise taxes on cigarettes"The left hand says "Let's give smokers tax money in the way of programs and incentives to help them quit"
Let's increase revenue and plan on using it and yet be doing everything we can to stop people from buying the item that is going to raise our revenue. Simply mind boggling that the people who dream this up can actually dress themselves. Scarier is that they are allowed to and do procreate there by insuring further generations of morons and idiots to run governments.
When more people quit smoking where is the government going to raise taxes and fees to make up the difference? Also are the tax increases going to at least cover the programs and incentives to get people to quit? I'm taking about the advertisements to quit also.